"Illinois
and South Carolina are two good examples of states that use a common
sense approach to regulation. In both cases, costs have
gone down, more companies are writing insurance giving consumers
more choices, and public officials are hearing fewer complaints...South
Carolina's approach to auto insurance was much like New Jersey until
a few years ago. In 1997, legislation was passed to deregulate the
market. The results have already been dramatic for consumers, the
number of insurers doing business in the state doubled over a one-year
period, and good drivers generally have seen rate decreases of 20
percent or more." "Four
years ago, South Carolina lawmakers, weary of wrestling with a system
of automobile insurance regulation no one liked, decided to scrap
it and let the market set the rates. So far, it seems to
have worked well, resulting in smaller insurance bills for many
drivers...and more than 100 new companies writing auto-insurance
policies in the state." "South
Carolina’s current auto insurance system, where competition
— rather than the state — sets the rates, has meant
that the state has dropped from 26th to 38th in the nation for average
insurance costs...Meanwhile, the number of companies selling
auto insurance in South Carolina has doubled from 74 to 156." "Insurance
companies are again entering South Carolina...Between March
1999, when the new rating law took effect, and August 2000, 105
auto insurers had entered the market...competitive pricing
that can attract insurers provides a ready-made mechanism for the
market to correct itself — if only it is allowed to work." "In free-market
states such as Illinois and South Carolina, there are numerous
auto insurance companies providing consumers with real choices at
competitive prices without subsidizing risky drivers with
bad records." Click here to download this text as a PDF. (*Requires Adobe Acrobat)
|
|