The Unintended Effects
of Rate Regulation Done the Wrong Way
Rate
regulation can have unintended negative effects on the affordability,
availability, and quality of insurance. All evidence continues to
show that the answer to insurance market problems is a system that
promotes healthy competition with strong consumer safeguards.
| Unintended
Consequences
of Rate Regulation:
•
higher prices in the long
run
• fewer companies offering policies
• less coverage options, so
consumers are forced to
pay for coverage they
don’t want
• decreased product quality and availability
due to an inflexible market that cannot
respond to changing conditions |
"Thus,
in the long run, rate regulation does not significantly
reduce prices for consumers. However, it generally reduces
availability of coverage, increases price volatility, and reduces
the quality and variety of services available to consumers."
- Property-Liability Insurance Price Deregulation: The Last
Bastion? J. David Cummins, 2001
"There
is little or no evidence that prior approval on average has a material
effect on average rates for any given level of claims costs.
This finding is consistent with an inability of rate regulation
to reduce average rates materially and persistently...without significantly
reducing product quality or ultimately causing widespread exit by
insurers."
- Effects of Prior Approval Rate Regulation of Auto Insurance,
Scott E. Harrington, 2001
"A review
of six states (Illinois, New Jersey, California, Massachusetts,
South Carolina, and Texas) reveals that competitive pricing for
all property-liability insurance produces positive market outcomes
and that the unintended and
adverse consequences of prior approval are real...NCOIL
and NAIC should adopt an unequivocal policy of favoring price competition
over prior approval."
- Modernizing Insurance Rate Regulation, Philip R. O’Connor
and Eugene P. Esposito, 2001
"Prior
approval regulation entails potentially large direct and indirect
costs...Those costs are unnecessary and counterproductive.
Deregulation of voluntary market rates would eliminate those costs,
thereby producing efficiency gains and benefiting consumers."
- Insurance Deregulation and the Public Interest, Scott E. Harrington,
2000
"In essence,
regulation generally creates material economic inefficiencies, such
as consumer welfare loss due to limited choice, insurance availability
problems, reduced product quality, and higher than expected insolvency
rates...In the long run, price regulation does not result
in lower prices for consumers, but it can create serious economic
inefficiencies that destabilize insurance markets and ultimately
increase the price of insurance."
- Property-Liability Insurance Price Deregulation: The Last
Bastion? J. David Cummins, 2001
Click
here to download this text as a PDF.
(*Requires
Adobe
Acrobat)
|
 |
|
Texas
insurance issues are definitely "hot" topics
right now. Register today for TCAIS email
updates - we'll give you the latest developments
on emerging issues and what our state leaders
are doing about them.
Click
here to sign up now!
|
|
|
|